↓ Skip to main content

Failure to replicate the STAP cell phenomenon

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
370 X users
patent
3 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure to replicate the STAP cell phenomenon
Published in
Nature, September 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature15513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro De Los Angeles, Francesco Ferrari, Yuko Fujiwara, Ronald Mathieu, Soohyun Lee, Semin Lee, Ho-Chou Tu, Samantha Ross, Stephanie Chou, Minh Nguyen, Zhaoting Wu, Thorold W. Theunissen, Benjamin E. Powell, Sumeth Imsoonthornruksa, Jiekai Chen, Marti Borkent, Vladislav Krupalnik, Ernesto Lujan, Marius Wernig, Jacob H. Hanna, Konrad Hochedlinger, Duanqing Pei, Rudolf Jaenisch, Hongkui Deng, Stuart H. Orkin, Peter J. Park, George Q. Daley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 370 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 26%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Other 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Chemistry 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 346. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#94,896
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,638
of 98,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,138
of 286,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#151
of 1,024 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,024 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.