↓ Skip to main content

Timmy’s in the well: Empathy and prosocial helping in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Learning & Behavior, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 903)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
128 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
297 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Timmy’s in the well: Empathy and prosocial helping in dogs
Published in
Learning & Behavior, July 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13420-018-0332-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily M. Sanford, Emma R. Burt, Julia E. Meyers-Manor

Abstract

Dogs are thought to evaluate humans' emotional states, and attend more to crying people than to humming people. However, it is unclear whether dogs would go beyond focusing attention on humans in need by providing more substantive help to them. This study used a trapped-other paradigm, modified from use in research on rats, to study prosocial helping in dogs. A human trapped behind a door either cried or hummed, and the dog's behavioral and physiological responses (i.e., door opening and heart rate variability) were recorded. Then, dogs participated in an impossible task to evaluate gaze at the owner as a measure of the strength of their relationship with their owner. Dogs in the distress condition opened at the same frequency, but significantly more quickly, than dogs in the control condition. In the distress condition, the dogs that opened showed lower levels of stress and were able to suppress their own distress response, thus enabling them to open the door more quickly. In the control condition, opening was not related to the dog's stress level and may have instead been motivated by curiosity or a desire for social contact. Results from the impossible task suggest that openers in the distress condition may have a stronger bond with their owner than non-openers, while non-openers in the control condition showed a stronger bond than openers, which may further suggest that the trapped-other paradigm is reflective of empathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 297 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 36 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 36 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1265. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#10,878
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Behavior
#2
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199
of 341,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Behavior
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.