| Title |
National Park Development in China: Conservation or Commercialization?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-011-0194-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guangyu Wang, John L. Innes, Sara W. Wu, Judi Krzyzanowski, Yongyuan Yin, Shuanyou Dai, Xiaoping Zhang, Sihui Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 37 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#178,260
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#12
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#583
of 145,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.