↓ Skip to main content

Esophageal bronchogenic cyst and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Esophageal bronchogenic cyst and review of the literature
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4082-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria S. Altieri, Richard Zheng, Aurora D. Pryor, Alan Heimann, Soojin Ahn, Dana A. Telem

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 5 26%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,135,049
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,445
of 6,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,954
of 360,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#52
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.