| Title |
The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8 |
| Authors |
Anne-Marie Boulay, Jane Bare, Lorenzo Benini, Markus Berger, Michael J. Lathuillière, Alessandro Manzardo, Manuele Margni, Masaharu Motoshita, Montserrat Núñez, Amandine Valerie Pastor, Bradley Ridoutt, Taikan Oki, Sebastien Worbe, Stephan Pfister |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 864 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 862 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 150 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 136 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 124 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 5% |
| Other | 107 | 12% |
| Unknown | 243 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 209 | 24% |
| Engineering | 137 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 16 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 114 | 13% |
| Unknown | 329 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,561,383
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#73
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,012
of 335,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.