↓ Skip to main content

A data-independent acquisition workflow for qualitative screening of new psychoactive substances in biological samples

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
A data-independent acquisition workflow for qualitative screening of new psychoactive substances in biological samples
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-9036-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliet Kinyua, Noelia Negreira, María Ibáñez, Lubertus Bijlsma, Félix Hernández, Adrian Covaci, Alexander L. N. van Nuijs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 19 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,892
of 9,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,995
of 289,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#70
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,818 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.