| Title |
Unreliable and Difficult-to-Access Food for Those in Need: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Urban Food Pantries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Community Health, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10900-018-0549-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zoë A. Ginsburg, Alexander D. Bryan, Ellen B. Rubinstein, Hilary J. Frankel, Andrew R. Maroko, Clyde B. Schechter, Kristen Cooksey Stowers, Sean C. Lucan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Turkey | 1 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,119,109
of 24,254,113 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#132
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,012
of 300,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,254,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.