↓ Skip to main content

Gastric Cancer and Synchronous Hepatic Metastases: Is It Possible to Recognize Candidates to R0 Resection?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Gastric Cancer and Synchronous Hepatic Metastases: Is It Possible to Recognize Candidates to R0 Resection?
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2014
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-4018-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Paolo Morgagni, Daniele Marrelli, Alberto Marchet, Chiara Cipollari, Luigina Graziosi, Silvia Ministrini, Giovanni Vittimberga, Annibale Donini, Donato Nitti, Franco Roviello, Arianna Coniglio, Giovanni de Manzoni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Design 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,427,608
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,982
of 6,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,946
of 238,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#86
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.