↓ Skip to main content

Verletzungen der posterioren und lateralen Brustwand – Bedeutung einer zusätzlichen Klavikulafraktur

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Verletzungen der posterioren und lateralen Brustwand – Bedeutung einer zusätzlichen Klavikulafraktur
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00113-018-0528-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Langenbach, S. Krinner, F. F. Hennig, A. Ekkernkamp, S. Schulz-Drost

Abstract

Flail chest wall injuries (FCI) are common in younger patients due to high-speed trauma and in older patients due to low-energy trauma or falls from a low height. They show a high incidence of concomitant injuries and are therefore associated with high morbidity and mortality. If there is also an ipsilateral clavicular fracture (CF), the outcome is significantly poorer. The skeleton of the shoulder and chest loses stability and can lead to a loss of function of the shoulder and a pronounced deformation of the chest wall. This article shows the origin and clinical importance of FCI. What importance does a concomitant ipsilateral CF have and how can these costoclavicular injuries (CCI) be managed conservatively and operatively? After primary emergency care of the patients with appropriate diagnostics, in the presence of CCI operative stabilization was carried out by means of locked plate osteosynthesis of the clavicle and the affected ribs via minimally invasive approaches with the patient under general anesthesia. Patients were followed up postoperatively. Various minimally invasive posterolateral approaches to the chest wall were previously performed in a corpse study and then put into practice. This study presents therapeutic options for the reconstruction of the chest wall based on the established literature and clinical examples. An ipsilateral CF combined with fractures of the 2nd-4th ribs can be treated through an innovative clavipectoral approach. For the other fractures, standard approaches to the anterolateral and posterolateral chest wall are performed, which are associated with a good outcome in clinical practice. An operative stabilization should be performed at the latest when FCI or CCI together with a dislocating fracture and a marked deformation of the thoracic wall are present. Remaining misalignments are associated with a simultaneous loss of function of the chest wall and shoulder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Materials Science 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#439
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,327
of 340,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.