↓ Skip to main content

Abriebanalyse mit virtuellen CAD-basierten Röntgenaufnahmen in der Endoprothetik

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Abriebanalyse mit virtuellen CAD-basierten Röntgenaufnahmen in der Endoprothetik
Published in
Die Orthopädie, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00132-018-3602-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Haversath, S. Klebingat, die VITAS-Gruppe, M. Jäger

Abstract

The articulating parts of an endoprosthetic joint are subjected to constant wear, which results in loss of material. In peri-implant tissue, the wear debris particles cause aseptic inflammation with osteolysis and aseptic loosening. Due to the associated bone resorption-which can be considerable-"particle disease" represents a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Continuous improvements in the material properties of polyethylene during the past decades have resulted in reduced wear and longer implant survival times. To evaluate wear properties in polyethylene liners after total hip arthroplasty in vivo, different graphics-based, semiautomatic software packages were developed to measure femoral head penetration in radiographic image series. However, the reduced wear properties of the new materials rendered their precise analysis and evaluation more difficult, and no software was able to reproduce the accuracy of the complex and expensive radiostereometric analysis first described by Selvik in 1974, which is still viewed as the gold standard. The aim of this study is to describe the validation of a novel and accurate method to analyze polyethylene wear in vivo using virtual computer-aided detection/diagnosis (CAD)-based radiographic images. Furthermore, its use is presented based on the first 5‑year follow-up results of a multicenter approach evaluating the impact of vitamin E-blended polyethylene in cementless total hip replacement. Our data support the high accuracy of CAD-based virtual evaluation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 36%
Other 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Unspecified 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,472
of 340,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.