↓ Skip to main content

Rapid development of cardiac dysfunction in a canine model of insulin resistance and moderate obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Rapid development of cardiac dysfunction in a canine model of insulin resistance and moderate obesity
Published in
Diabetologia, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00125-015-3767-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josiane L. Broussard, Michael D. Nelson, Cathryn M. Kolka, Isaac Asare Bediako, Rebecca L. Paszkiewicz, Laura Smith, Edward W. Szczepaniak, Darko Stefanovski, Lidia S. Szczepaniak, Richard N. Bergman

Abstract

The worldwide incidence of obesity and diabetes continues to rise at an alarming rate. A major cause of the morbidity and mortality associated with obesity and diabetes is heart disease, yet the mechanisms that lead to cardiovascular complications remain unclear. We performed cardiac MRI to assess left ventricular morphology and function during the development of moderate obesity and insulin resistance in a well-established canine model (n = 26). To assess the influence of dietary fat composition, we randomised animals to a traditional lard diet (rich in saturated and monounsaturated fat; n = 12), a salmon oil diet (rich in polyunsaturated fat; n = 8) or a control diet (n = 6). High-fat feeding with lard increased body weight and fasting insulin and markedly reduced insulin sensitivity. Lard feeding also significantly reduced left ventricular function, evidenced by a worsening of circumferential strain and impairment in left ventricular torsion. High-fat feeding with salmon oil increased body weight; however, salmon oil feeding did not impair insulin sensitivity or cardiac function. These data emphasise the importance of dietary fat composition on both metabolic and cardiac function, and have important implications for the relationship between diet and health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,799,073
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,663
of 5,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,712
of 272,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#35
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.