↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autophagy in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027485
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thien Tra, Lan Gong, Lin-Pin Kao, Xue-Lei Li, Catarina Grandela, Rodney J. Devenish, Ernst Wolvetang, Mark Prescott

Abstract

Autophagy (macroautophagy) is a degradative process that involves the sequestration of cytosolic material including organelles into double membrane vesicles termed autophagosomes for delivery to the lysosome. Autophagy is essential for preimplantation development of mouse embryos and cavitation of embryoid bodies. The precise roles of autophagy during early human embryonic development, remain however largely uncharacterized. Since human embryonic stem cells constitute a unique model system to study early human embryogenesis we investigated the occurrence of autophagy in human embryonic stem cells. We have, using lentiviral transduction, established multiple human embryonic stem cell lines that stably express GFP-LC3, a fluorescent marker for the autophagosome. Each cell line displays both a normal karyotype and pluripotency as indicated by the presence of cell types representative of the three germlayers in derived teratomas. GFP expression and labelling of autophagosomes is retained after differentiation. Baseline levels of autophagy detected in cultured undifferentiated hESC were increased or decreased in the presence of rapamycin and wortmannin, respectively. Interestingly, autophagy was upregulated in hESCs induced to undergo differentiation by treatment with type I TGF-beta receptor inhibitor SB431542 or removal of MEF secreted maintenance factors. In conclusion we have established hESCs capable of reporting macroautophagy and identify a novel link between autophagy and early differentiation events in hESC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
China 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 80 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 26%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,125,620
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#103,380
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,128
of 141,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,327
of 2,652 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,652 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.