↓ Skip to main content

Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9793-1
Authors

Costanza Consolandi, Ameeta Jaiswal-Dale, Elisa Poggiani, Alessandro Vercelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Researcher 20 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Other 57 23%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 85 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 65 26%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 66 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,467,636
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,181
of 2,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,569
of 82,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.