↓ Skip to main content

Isolation and characterization of influenza A viruses from environmental water at an overwintering site of migratory birds in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Isolation and characterization of influenza A viruses from environmental water at an overwintering site of migratory birds in Japan
Published in
Archives of Virology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00705-015-2610-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kosuke Okuya, Toshiko Kawabata, Kiori Nagano, Kyoko Tsukiyama-Kohara, Isamu Kusumoto, Kozo Takase, Makoto Ozawa

Abstract

The Izumi plain in Kagoshima prefecture, Japan, is an overwintering site of more than 10,000 cranes. The wet paddy areas are artificially created to provide roosting sites for the cranes every winter. Since wild ducks, known to be a natural reservoir of influenza A viruses, also overwinter in this area, the cranes' roost water likely serves as a source of influenza A virus infection. To assess this potential risk, we collected 126 water samples from the cranes' roost in the 2012/2013 winter season for virus isolation. We isolated six influenza viruses of three subtypes (H3N8, H4N6, and H4N8) from the water samples collected in the months of November and December. Genetic analysis of our isolates indicated that these viruses were genetically similar to the low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses circulating among Eurasian waterfowl. These findings suggest the possibility of the cranes becoming infected with the avian influenza viruses that are present in their roost water.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,774,112
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#2,862
of 4,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,674
of 274,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#24
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.