| Title |
Quality standardization of herbal medicines of Spondias dulcis Parkinson using analytical and microbiological analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10973-018-7486-2 |
| Authors |
Felipe Hugo Alencar Fernandes, Fabio Boylan, Hérida Regina Nunes Salgado |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,140,078
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#11
of 1,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,714
of 342,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.