You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When portfolio theory can help environmental investment planning to reduce climate risk to future environmental outcomes—and when it cannot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12596 |
| Authors |
Amy W. Ando, Jennifer Fraterrigo, Glenn Guntenspergen, Aparna Howlader, Mindy Mallory, Jennifer H. Olker, Samuel Stickley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 21% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,479,843
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#944
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,705
of 339,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.