↓ Skip to main content

Haste Makes Waste: The Interplay Between Dissolution and Precipitation of Supersaturating Formulations

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Haste Makes Waste: The Interplay Between Dissolution and Precipitation of Supersaturating Formulations
Published in
The AAPS Journal, September 2015
DOI 10.1208/s12248-015-9825-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dajun D. Sun, Ping I. Lee

Abstract

Contrary to the early philosophy of supersaturating formulation design for oral solid dosage forms, current evidence shows that an exceedingly high rate of supersaturation generation could result in a suboptimal in vitro dissolution profile and subsequently could reduce the in vivo oral bioavailability of amorphous solid dispersions. In this commentary, we outline recent research efforts on the specific effects of the rate and extent of supersaturation generation on the overall kinetic solubility profiles of supersaturating formulations. Additional insights into an appropriate definition of sink versus nonsink dissolution conditions and the solubility advantage of amorphous pharmaceuticals are also highlighted. The interplay between dissolution and precipitation kinetics should be carefully considered in designing a suitable supersaturating formulation to best improve the dissolution behavior and oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 48 39%
Chemistry 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,427,608
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#1,101
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,515
of 266,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.