| Title |
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-018-3682-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cuihua Guo, Meifang Luo, Xuxiang Wang, Saijun Huang, Zhaoxue Meng, Jie Shao, Xuan Zhang, Zhi Shao, Jieling Wu, Diana L. Robins, Jin Jing |
| Abstract |
Although early detection of autism facilitates intervention, early detection strategies are not yet widespread in China. To improve the situation, the Chinese version of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) was validated. The sample included 7928 toddlers, aged 16 to 30 months, screened during their routine care in six provinces of China. When the cut-off value was 3, the sensitivity and specificity of M-CHAT-R were 0.963 and 0.865. The inter-rater reliability and the test-retest reliability were also adequate (intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.853 and 0.759, both ps < .01). The Chinese version of M-CHAT-R/F is an effective tool for early detection of ASD and is applicable to early screening in China. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,599,348
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,734
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,653
of 333,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#59
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.