↓ Skip to main content

Markers of metabolic endotoxemia as related to metabolic syndrome in an elderly male population at high cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Markers of metabolic endotoxemia as related to metabolic syndrome in an elderly male population at high cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13098-018-0360-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayodeji Awoyemi, Marius Trøseid, Harald Arnesen, Svein Solheim, Ingebjørg Seljeflot

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of conditions that conjoined represents a 1.5-2.5 fold increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recent studies have reported that gut dysbiosis and leakage of bacterial components, may contribute to the metabolic disturbances and systemic inflammation observed in subjects with MetS. Chronic exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been shown to induce features of MetS in experimental studies. LPS interacts with the innate immune system, facilitated through LPS-binding protein (LBP) and the co-receptor CD14, both regarded as markers of gut leakage. We investigated whether circulating levels of LBP and sCD14 are associated with the presence of MetS and its components, and further any association with systemic inflammation. We examined 482 men, aged between 65 and 75 years, all at high CVD risk. MetS criteria's according to the US National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III were met in 182 subjects (38%). Levels of LBP and sCD14 did not differ between individuals with and without MetS. However, a trend towards increased risk of MetS through quartiles of LBP was observed (p = 0.05). Individuals in the highest quartile (Q4), had an increased risk of MetS (OR = 1.76, 95% CI (1.04-3.00), compared to the lowest quartile (Q1) (p = 0.04). With regard to the separate constituents of MetS, patients who met the waist circumference criterion had significant higher concentration of LBP compared to those who did not (p = 0.04). We also found a weak, but significant correlation between LBP and waist circumference (r = 0.10, p = 0.03). Moderate, yet significant correlations were observed between both LBP and sCD14 and several markers of systemic inflammation (r = 0.1-0.23; p < 0.001-0.04). The trend for increased prevalence of MetS observed with increasing quartiles of LBP seems to be mainly driven by central obesity in our male cohort. The associations between LBP, sCD14 and systemic inflammation, indicate a potential role of the innate immune system in MetS.Trial registration CLINICALTRIALS.GOV, NCT00764010. Registered 01 October 2008-retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00764010?term=NCT00764010&rank=1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#474
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,265
of 329,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.