↓ Skip to main content

FMST: an Automatic Neuron Tracing Method Based on Fast Marching and Minimum Spanning Tree

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
FMST: an Automatic Neuron Tracing Method Based on Fast Marching and Minimum Spanning Tree
Published in
Neuroinformatics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12021-018-9392-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Yang, Ming Hao, Xiaoyang Liu, Zhijiang Wan, Ning Zhong, Hanchuan Peng

Abstract

Neuron reconstruction is an important technique in computational neuroscience. Although there are many reconstruction algorithms, few can generate robust results. In this paper, we propose a reconstruction algorithm called fast marching spanning tree (FMST). FMST is based on a minimum spanning tree method (MST) and improve its performance in two aspects: faster implementation and no loss of small branches. The contributions of the proposed method are as follows. Firstly, the Euclidean distance weight of edges in MST is improved to be a more reasonable value, which is related to the probability of the existence of an edge. Secondly, a strategy of pruning nodes is presented, which is based on the radius of a node's inscribed ball. Thirdly, separate branches of broken neuron reconstructions can be merged into a single tree. FMST and many other state of the art reconstruction methods were implemented on two datasets: 120 Drosophila neurons and 163 neurons with gold standard reconstructions. Qualitative and quantitative analysis on experimental results demonstrates that the performance of FMST is good compared with many existing methods. Especially, on the 91 fruitfly neurons with gold standard and evaluated by five metrics, FMST is one of two methods with best performance among all 27 state of the art reconstruction methods. FMST is a good and practicable neuron reconstruction algorithm, and can be implemented in Vaa3D platform as a neuron tracing plugin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Engineering 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#20,076,137
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#325
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,564
of 334,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.