↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Recruitment and Retention of Minority Children for Autism Research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Recruitment and Retention of Minority Children for Autism Research
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2603-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irina Zamora, Marian E. Williams, Marcia Higareda, Barbara Y. Wheeler, Pat Levitt

Abstract

Given the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in health research (Heiat et al. in Arch Int Med 162(15):1-17, 2002; Kelly et al. in J Nat Med Assoc 97:777-783, 2005; United States Department of Health and Human Services. Monitoring adherence to the NIH policy on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. http://orwh.od.nih.gov/research/inclusion/reports.asp , 2013), this study evaluated promising strategies to effectively recruit Latinos into genetic research on autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The study included 97 children, aged 5-17 years, with ASD; 82.5 % of the participants were identified as Latino/Hispanic. Traditional and culture-specific recruitment and retention strategies were compared between the Latino and non-Latino groups. Culture-specific, parent-centered approaches were found to be successful in engaging and retaining Latino participants for research involving genetic testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 25%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,364,083
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,015
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,393
of 286,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#25
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.