↓ Skip to main content

Immunomarker Support Vector Machine Classifier for Prediction of Gastric Cancer Survival and Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Benefit

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunomarker Support Vector Machine Classifier for Prediction of Gastric Cancer Survival and Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Benefit
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, November 2018
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0848
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Current TNM staging system can't provide adequate information for prediction of prognosis and chemotherapeutic benefits. To construct a classifier to predict prognosis and identify a subset of patients who can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. We detected expression of 15 immunohistochemistry (IHC) features in tumors from 251 GC patients and evaluated the association of their expression level with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Then, integrating multiple clinicopathologic features and IHC features, we used support vector machine (SVM) -based methods to develop a prognostic classifier (GC-SVM classifier) with eleven features. Further validation of the GC-SVM classifier was performed in two validation cohort of 535 patients. The GC-SVM classifier integrated patient sex, CEA, lymph node metastasis and the protein expression level of eight features, including CD3invasive margin (IM), CD3center of tumor (CT), CD45ROCT, CD57IM, CD66bIM, CD68CT and CD34. Significant differences were found between the high- and low- GC-SVM patients in 5-year OS and DFS in training and validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis revealed that the GC-SVM classifier was an independent prognostic factor. The classifier had higher predictive accuracy for OS and DFS than TNM stage and can complement the prognostic value of the TNM staging system. Further analysis revealed that stage II and III GC patients with high-GC-SVM were pone to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The newly developed GC-SVM classifier was a powerful predictor of OS and DFS. Moreover, the GC-SVM classifier could predict which patients with stage II and III GC benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 35 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Computer Science 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 39 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#27,693,281
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#16,296
of 17,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,986
of 385,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#178
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.