↓ Skip to main content

Advances in resistive pulse sensors: Devices bridging the void between molecular and microscopic detection

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Today, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advances in resistive pulse sensors: Devices bridging the void between molecular and microscopic detection
Published in
Nano Today, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.08.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darby Kozak, Will Anderson, Robert Vogel, Matt Trau

Abstract

Since the first reported use of a biological ion channel to detect differences in single stranded genomic base pairs in 1996, a renaissance in nanoscale resistive pulse sensors has ensued. This resurgence of a technique originally outlined and commercialized over fifty years ago has largely been driven by advances in nanoscaled fabrication, and ultimately, the prospect of a rapid and inexpensive means for genomic sequencing as well as other macromolecular characterization. In this pursuit, the potential application of these devices to characterize additional properties such as the size, shape, charge, and concentration of nanoscaled materials (10 - 900 nm) has been largely overlooked. Advances in nanotechnology and biotechnology are driving the need for simple yet sensitive individual object readout devices such as resistive pulse sensors. This review will examine the recent progress in pore-based sensing in the nanoscale range. A detailed analysis of three new types of pore sensors - in-series, parallel, and size-tunable pores - has been included. These pores offer improved measurement sensitivity over a wider particle size range. The fundamental physical chemistry of these techniques, which is still evolving, will be reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 154 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 31%
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 47 29%
Chemistry 26 16%
Physics and Astronomy 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Materials Science 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nano Today
#355
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,608
of 143,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Today
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.