Title |
Excision of Unstable Artificial Gene-Specific Inverted Repeats Mediates Scar-Free Gene Deletions in Escherichia coli
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12010-014-1402-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Crystal Jing Ying Tear, Chanyuen Lim, Hua Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 29% |
Researcher | 6 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,284,630
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#33
of 2,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,999
of 362,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.