| Title |
Measuring population mental health and social well-being
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-011-0317-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Van Lente, Margaret M. Barry, Michal Molcho, Karen Morgan, Dorothy Watson, Janas Harrington, Hannah McGee |
| Abstract |
This paper examines the relationships between indicators of positive and negative dimensions of mental health, social well-being and physical health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#5,187,758
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#578
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,266
of 153,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.