↓ Skip to main content

Population-averaged MRI atlases for automated image processing and assessments of lumbar paraspinal muscles

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Population-averaged MRI atlases for automated image processing and assessments of lumbar paraspinal muscles
Published in
European Spine Journal, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5704-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiming Xiao, Maryse Fortin, Michele C. Battié, Hassan Rivaz

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests an association between lumbar paraspinal muscle degeneration and low back pain (LBP). Currently, time-consuming and laborious manual segmentations of paraspinal muscles are commonly performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) axial scans. Automated image analysis algorithms can mitigate these drawbacks, but they often require individual MRIs to be aligned to a standard "reference" atlas. Such atlases are well established in automated neuroimaging analysis. Our aim was to create atlases of similar nature for automated paraspinal muscle measurements. Lumbosacral T2-weighted MRIs were acquired from 117 patients who experienced LBP, stratified by gender and age group (30-39, 40-49, and 50-59 years old). Axial MRI slices of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels at mid-disc were obtained and aligned using group-wise linear and nonlinear image registration to produce a set of unbiased population-averaged atlases for lumbar paraspinal muscles. The resulting atlases represent the averaged morphology and MRI intensity features of the corresponding cohorts. Differences in paraspinal muscle shapes and fat infiltration levels with respect to gender and age can be visually identified from the population-averaged data from both linear and nonlinear registrations. We constructed a set of population-averaged atlases for developing automated algorithms to help analyze paraspinal muscle morphometry from axial MRI scans. Such an advancement could greatly benefit the fields of paraspinal muscle and LBP research. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Engineering 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,269,322
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,544
of 4,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,275
of 330,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#21
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.