↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence of tarsal tunnel syndrome in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The prevalence of tarsal tunnel syndrome in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy
Published in
European Spine Journal, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-4246-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaojun Zheng, Yu Zhu, Jianyuan Jiang, Xiaosheng Ma, Feizhou Lu, Xiang Jin, Robert Weber

Abstract

Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is a painful foot condition. Lumbosacral radiculopathy (LR) may also present with symptoms occurring in TTS. However, no studies have been reported to determine the possible coexistence of these two conditions. The aim of our study was to identify the prevalence of TTS in patients with confirmed LR and to analyze the clinical and electrodiagnostic features of patients with both TTS and LR. Medial and lateral plantar nerve mixed studies, peroneal motor studies and deep peroneal sensory studies were performed in 81 normal subjects and 561 patients with LR. The Tinel's test and other provocative tests were performed in the LR patient group, and the clinical symptoms of TTS were also analyzed. The frequency of TTS was investigated in all radiculopathy group patients with different nerve root lesions. Concomitant TTS was found in 27 (4.8 %) patients with LR. Abnormal results of sensory/mixed conduction tests were observed in 25/27 (92.6 %) patients, and 11/27 (40.7 %) patients had abnormal results of motor conduction tests. Positivity for the Tinel's test and special provocative tests was found in 15/27 (55.6 %) and 17/27 (63.0 %) patients, respectively. Overall, 9/27 (33.3 %) patients had typical symptoms, and suspicious clinical symptoms were found in the other 14/27 (51.9 %) patients. The frequency of coexisting TTS was not statistically different among the single-level L4, L5 or S1 radiculopathy, or between the single-level and multi-level radiculopathies (P > 0.05). The findings suggest that the prevalence of TTS is significant in patients with LR. Thus, more caution should be paid when diagnosing and managing patients with LR due to the possible existence of TTS, as their management strategies are quite different.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Other 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Unspecified 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,214,454
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,542
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,083
of 274,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#13
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.