| Title |
A genome-wide diversity study of grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-018-3945-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Michel Hily, Monique Beuve, Emmanuelle Vigne, Gérard Demangeat, Thierry Candresse, Olivier Lemaire |
| Abstract |
Over the last decade, many scientific disciplines have been impacted by the dawn of new sequencing techniques (HTS: high throughput sequencing). Plant pathology and more specifically virology have been greatly transformed by this 'metagenomics' paradigm shift. Such tools significantly facilitate disease diagnostics with tremendous sensitivity, providing invaluable information such as an exhaustive list of viruses being present in a sample as well as their relative concentration. In addition, many new plant viruses have been discovered. Using RNAseq technology, in silico reconstruction of complete viral genome sequences is easily attainable. This step is of importance for taxonomy, population structure analyses, phylogeography and viral evolution studies. Here, after assembling 81 new near-complete genome sequences of grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV), we performed a genome-wide diversity study of this ubiquitous virus of grapevine worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,044,672
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#2,247
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,461
of 329,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#17
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.