↓ Skip to main content

Impact of lung disease on respiratory impedance in young children with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Respiratory Journal, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of lung disease on respiratory impedance in young children with cystic fibrosis
Published in
European Respiratory Journal, September 2015
DOI 10.1183/13993003.00156-2015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn A. Ramsey, Sarath C. Ranganathan, Catherine L. Gangell, Lidija Turkovic, Judy Park, Billy Skoric, Stephen M. Stick, Peter D. Sly, Graham L. Hall

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the forced oscillation technique (FOT) to detect underlying lung disease in preschool children with cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosed following newborn screening.184 children (aged 3-6 years) with CF underwent lung function testing on 422 occasions using the FOT to assess respiratory resistance and reactance at the time of their annual bronchoalveolar lavage collection and chest computed tomography scan. We examined associations between FOT outcomes and the presence and progression of respiratory inflammation, infection and structural lung disease.Children with CF who had pronounced respiratory disease, including free neutrophil elastase activity, infection with pro-inflammatory pathogens and structural lung abnormalities had similar FOT outcomes to those children without detectable lung disease. In addition, the progression of lung disease over 1 year was not associated with worsening FOT outcomes.We conclude that the forced oscillation technique is relatively insensitive to detect underlying lung disease in preschool children with CF. However, FOT may still be of value in improving our understanding of the physiological changes associated with early CF lung disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,825,907
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from European Respiratory Journal
#6,503
of 8,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,571
of 274,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Respiratory Journal
#144
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.