| Title |
Mechanical damage to pollen aids nutrient acquisition in Heliconius butterflies (Nymphalidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthropod-Plant Interactions, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11829-009-9074-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harald W. Krenn, Monika J. B. Eberhard, Stefan H. Eberhard, Anna-Laetitia Hikl, Werner Huber, Lawrence E. Gilbert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,467,636
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#91
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,103
of 90,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them