↓ Skip to main content

Transcript of WAC 8 Digital Bioarchaeological Ethics Panel Discussion, 29 August 2016 and Resolution on Ethical Use of Digital Bioarchaeological Data

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeologies, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 140)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Transcript of WAC 8 Digital Bioarchaeological Ethics Panel Discussion, 29 August 2016 and Resolution on Ethical Use of Digital Bioarchaeological Data
Published in
Archaeologies, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11759-018-9343-0
Authors

Brenna R. Hassett, Carolyn Rando, Emmy Bocaege, Marta Alfonso Durruty, Cara Hirst, Siân Smith, Priscilla Ferreira Ulguim, Suzanna White, Andrew Wilson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,279,674
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Archaeologies
#7
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,540
of 332,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeologies
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them