↓ Skip to main content

Strange Harvest: a Cross-sectional Ecological Analysis of the Association Between Historic Lynching Events and 2010–2014 County Mortality Rates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Strange Harvest: a Cross-sectional Ecological Analysis of the Association Between Historic Lynching Events and 2010–2014 County Mortality Rates
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40615-018-0509-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janice C. Probst, Saundra Glover, Victor Kirksey

Abstract

While the causes of lynching, a violent expression of racism, have been explored, little research has addressed the long-term consequences of this phenomenon. We examined the associaton between living in a county with a history of lynching and contemporary mortality rates within Southern US states. County-level data for lynchings between 1877 and 1950 were available for 1221 counties. Lynching rates were standardized to the 1930 population. Age-adjusted mortality rates were aggregated over 2010-2014 to allow sufficient observations in small counties. Multivariable linear regression examined the association between lynching rate categories and mortality while holding other county characteristics constant. Overall age-adjusted mortality ranged from 863 deaths per 100,000 persons in counties with no recorded lynchings to 910 in the highest lynching rate counties (p < 0.000). In adjusted models, living in the highest versus lowest lynching category was associated with 34.9 (95% confidence interval 13.3-56.7) additional deaths per 100,000 per year for white males, 23.7 (95% CI 7.48-40.0) deaths for white females, and 31.0 (95% CI 3.6-58.4) deaths for African American females. No association was found for African American male death rates (31.3; 95% CI - 13.6 to 76.1). The mechanisms through which historic lynching events might be associated with contemporary mortality rates are not clear. We advocate further research into structural characteristics of counties that may influence such disparities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,135,543
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#102
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,714
of 342,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.