↓ Skip to main content

Relationships between left ventricular asynchrony and myocardial blood flow

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Relationships between left ventricular asynchrony and myocardial blood flow
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12350-015-0270-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Van Tosh, John R Votaw, C David Cooke, Nathaniel Reichek, Christopher J Palestro, Kenneth J Nichols

Abstract

(82)Rb PET protocols enable determination of left ventricular asynchrony (LVAS) at rest and stress, along with myocardial blood flow (MBF). We hypothesized that in patients with resting LVAS, MBF differs between those with stress-induced LVAS improvement and those with stress-induced LVAS deterioration. We retrospectively analyzed (82)Rb rest/regadenoson stress PET studies of 195 patients evaluated for known or suspected coronary artery disease. MBF was computed from first-pass data; function and relative perfusion were computed from myocardial equilibrium data. LVAS was defined as phase contraction bandwidth (BW) above (82)Rb gender-specific normal limits, with changes defined as BW moving into or out of normal ranges. Among the 195 patients, 64 had LVAS at rest, of whom 13 reverted to normal and 51 continued to have LVAS with stress. Patients who did not improve had lower stress MBF (1.04 ± 0.69 vs 1.58 ± 0.67, p = .02) and coronary flow reserve (1.94 ± 1.16 vs 3.04 ± 1.22, p = .01) than those who did improve. ROC analysis indicated that the parameter most strongly associated with improvement in asynchrony for patients with resting LVAS was reduction in MBF heterogeneity (ROC area (accuracy) = 84%, sensitivity = 92%, and specificity = 67%). LVAS is highly correlated with MBF and CVR, with stress-induced improvement in synchronicity most strongly associated with improved MBF homogeneity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,783,688
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#909
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,307
of 285,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.