↓ Skip to main content

Fluctuations in p53 Signaling Allow Escape from Cell-Cycle Arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluctuations in p53 Signaling Allow Escape from Cell-Cycle Arrest
Published in
Molecular Cell, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.031
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Reyes, Jia-Yun Chen, Jacob Stewart-Ornstein, Kyle W. Karhohs, Caroline S. Mock, Galit Lahav

Abstract

Biological signals need to be robust and filter small fluctuations yet maintain sensitivity to signals across a wide range of magnitudes. Here, we studied how fluctuations in DNA damage signaling relate to maintenance of long-term cell-cycle arrest. Using live-cell imaging, we quantified division profiles of individual human cells in the course of 1 week after irradiation. We found a subset of cells that initially establish cell-cycle arrest and then sporadically escape and divide. Using fluorescent reporters and mathematical modeling, we determined that fluctuations in the oscillatory pattern of the tumor suppressor p53 trigger a sharp switch between p21 and CDK2, leading to escape from arrest. Transient perturbation of p53 stability mimicked the noise in individual cells and was sufficient to trigger escape from arrest. Our results show that the self-reinforcing circuitry that mediates cell-cycle transitions can translate small fluctuations in p53 signaling into large phenotypic changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 21%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 53 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 100 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 51 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,550,182
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#2,477
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,207
of 341,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#67
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.