↓ Skip to main content

Cross-talk between Lysine-Modifying Enzymes Controls Site-Specific DNA Amplifications

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-talk between Lysine-Modifying Enzymes Controls Site-Specific DNA Amplifications
Published in
Cell, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sweta Mishra, Capucine Van Rechem, Sangita Pal, Thomas L. Clarke, Damayanti Chakraborty, Sarah D. Mahan, Joshua C. Black, Sedona E. Murphy, Michael S. Lawrence, Danette L. Daniels, Johnathan R. Whetstine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Chemistry 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,036,422
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#3,888
of 17,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,756
of 341,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#92
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.