↓ Skip to main content

Lower glomerular filtration rate predicts increased hepatic and mucosal toxicity in myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Lower glomerular filtration rate predicts increased hepatic and mucosal toxicity in myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12185-018-2507-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaharu Tamaki, Hideki Nakasone, Ayumi Gomyo, Jin Hayakawa, Yu Akahoshi, Naonori Harada, Machiko Kusuda, Yuko Ishihara, Koji Kawamura, Aki Tanihara, Miki Sato, Kiriko Terasako-Saito, Kazuaki Kameda, Hidenori Wada, Misato Kikuchi, Shun-ichi Kimura, Shinichi Kako, Yoshinobu Kanda

Abstract

High-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for younger myeloma patients. However, the correlation between its toxicity and renal impairment is not clear. We analyzed this relationship, focusing on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as an index of renal function. We evaluated 78 multiple myeloma patients who underwent ASCT following high-dose melphalan at our center. Patients were divided into a higher eGFR group (eGFR ≥ 60) and a lower eGFR group (eGFR < 60). Multivariate analyses revealed that lower eGFR was independently associated with alkaline phosphatase elevation (OR 10.2, P = 0.038), mucositis (OR 10.5, P = 0.032), grade 2-4 co-elevation of both aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (OR 21.3, P = 0.016), delay of reticulocyte engraftment (HR 0.524, P = 0.034), and delay of platelet engraftment (HR 0.535, P = 0.0016). However, lower eGFR was not correlated with overall survival or time-to-next treatment. In summary, renal dysfunction secondary to administration of high-dose melphalan was associated with increased hepatic and mucosal toxicity and delay of hematological recovery, but did not affect survival outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#933
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,701
of 329,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.