↓ Skip to main content

Th17-related cytokines: new players in the control of chronic intestinal inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Th17-related cytokines: new players in the control of chronic intestinal inflammation
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Monteleone, Francesco Pallone, Giovanni Monteleone

Abstract

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the main forms of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in man, are thought to be caused by an excessive and poorly controlled immune response that is directed against components of the normal microflora. The exact sequence of events by which this pathological process is triggered and maintained is not fully understood, but studies in experimental models of IBD and data emerging from recent clinical trials indicate that T cell-derived cytokines are crucial mediators of the tissue damage. Although CD and UC have been traditionally considered two typical examples of T helper (Th)1 or Th2-associated disease respectively, it is now known that CD- and UC-related inflammation is also marked by enhanced production of cytokines made by a distinct subset of Th cells, termed Th17 cells. Th17 cytokines can have both tissue-protective and inflammatory effects in the gut and there is evidence that Th17 cells can alter their cytokine program according to the stimuli received and convert into Th1-producing cells. These novel findings have contributed to advancing our understanding of mechanisms of gut tissue damage and open new avenues for development of therapeutic strategies in IBD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 9 8%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2011.
All research outputs
#12,790,433
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,686
of 3,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,291
of 141,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.