↓ Skip to main content

Creativity of images: using digital consensual assessment to evaluate mood boards

Overview of attention for article published in Fashion and Textiles, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 169)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Creativity of images: using digital consensual assessment to evaluate mood boards
Published in
Fashion and Textiles, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40691-017-0102-4
Authors

Charles Freeman, Sara Marcketti, Elena Karpova

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Lecturer 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 16 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 13%
Engineering 5 13%
Arts and Humanities 4 10%
Design 4 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,033,660
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Fashion and Textiles
#15
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,467
of 316,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fashion and Textiles
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.