| Title |
Inferences of evolutionary and ecological events that influenced the population structure of Plebeia remota, a stingless bee from Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Apidologie, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1051/apido/2009079 |
| Authors |
Flávio de Oliveira Francisco, Maria Cristina Arias |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,467,636
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#258
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,424
of 165,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.