↓ Skip to main content

Biology of the stingless beePlebeia remota (Holmberg): observations and evolutionary implications

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Biology of the stingless beePlebeia remota (Holmberg): observations and evolutionary implications
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01245700
Authors

F. D. J. van Benthem, V. L. Imperatriz-Fonseca, H. H. W. Velthuis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Brazil 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 52%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Computer Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,425,026
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#322
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,459
of 24,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them