| Title |
MicroRNA-346 functions as an oncogene in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-015-4046-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bin Chen, Wenyan Pan, Xiaoxi Lin, Zhenzhen Hu, Yunbo Jin, Hui Chen, Gang Ma, Yajing Qiu, Lei Chang, Chen Hua, Yun Zou, Yang Gao, Hanru Ying, Dongze Lv |
| Abstract |
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is an epidermal keratinocyte-derived skin tumor, which is the second most common skin cancer in the general population. Recently, studies showed that microRNAs (miRNAs) played an important role in the development of cancer. In our study, we showed that the expression of SRCIN1 was lower in cSCC tissues than in the matched normal tissues. Moreover, there was significant inversed correlation between miR-346 and SRCIN1 in cSCC tissues. The luciferase reporter assay data showed that miR-346 can target the SRCIN1 message via the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of SRCIN1. Overexpression of miR-346 inhibited the messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression of SRCIN1 in the A431 cells. In addition, ectopic expression of miR-346 promoted the A431 cell proliferation and migration. Meanwhile, SRCIN1 overexpression inhibited the A431 cell proliferation and migration. Rescue experiment has showed that SRCIN1 overexpression reduced the miR-346-induced A431 cell proliferation and migration. Herein, this study may provide miR-346 as a new therapeutic target for cSCC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,292,660
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,680
of 274,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#165
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.