↓ Skip to main content

Mixed sampling protocols improve the cost-effectiveness of roadkill surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Mixed sampling protocols improve the cost-effectiveness of roadkill surveys
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-0988-3
Authors

Aline Saturnino Costa, Fernando Ascensão, Alex Bager

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 118 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 51%
Environmental Science 26 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2015.
All research outputs
#16,171,492
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,889
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,607
of 270,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.