↓ Skip to main content

Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients and caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients and caregivers
Published in
Trials, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0948-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Sygna, Safora Johansen, Cornelia M. Ruland

Abstract

To test seven different strategies for recruitment in a randomized controlled trial, to report documented response data from each strategy, and to discuss recruitment challenges. We used 5 opt-in (potential participants have to do something active to contact or be contacted by the researcher) and 2 opt-out (potential participants have the option to decline being contacted about a study) recruitment strategies from February 2013 until July 2014 to contact 1562 cancer patient candidates for participation in a randomized controlled trial. For each of these cancer patients a caregiver was also invited to take part in the study. Of the 1562 candidates, 22.6 % were ineligible on initial contact, 56.7 % declined to participate on initial contact, and 8.9 % agreed orally to participate but did not complete the enrollment. The 2 opt-out strategies, on-site recruitment and routine care letters recruitment, yielded the highest number of recruited participants with 79 dyads and 58 dyads respectively, constituting 42.7 % and 31.4 % of the total number of enrolled candidates. The 5 opt-in recruitment approaches yielded 49 dyads for the study. Almost half of these dyads were recruited using the approach termed "relying on providers at the hospital." In this study, opt-out recruitment strategies appeared to be the most effective. Registration number NCT01867723 , registered February 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 29 30%