↓ Skip to main content

Six Years after the Commercial Introduction of Bt Maize in Spain: Field Evaluation, Impact and Future Prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Six Years after the Commercial Introduction of Bt Maize in Spain: Field Evaluation, Impact and Future Prospects
Published in
Transgenic Research, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11248-005-3998-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matilde Eizaguirre, Ramon Albajes, Carmen López, Jordi Eras, Belén Lumbierres, Xavier Pons

Abstract

We carried out a 6-year-field evaluation to assess potential hazards of growing Compa, a transgenic Bt maize variety based on the transformation event CG 00256-176. Two categories of hazards were investigated: the potential of the target corn borer Sesamia nonagrioides to evolve resistance to Bt maize and effects on non-target organisms. In order to address the first hazard, dispersal capacity of the corn borer was measured and our results indicated that larvae move to plants other than those onto which the female oviposited - even to plants in adjacent rows - in remarkable numbers and they do so mostly at a mature age, suggesting that mixing Bt and non-Bt seeds in the same field would not be a very useful deployment strategy to delay/prevent resistance. In addition, adults move among fields to mate and males may do so for up to 400 m. Three different aspects of potential non-target effects were investigated: sub-lethal effects on the target S. nonagrioides, effects on non-target maize pests, and effects on maize-dwelling predators. Larvae collected in Bt fields at later growth stages, in which event 176 Bt maize expresses Bt toxin at sub-lethal concentrations, had longer diapause and post-diapause development than larvae collected in non-Bt fields, a feature that might lead to a certain isolation between populations in both type of fields and accelerate Bt resistance evolution. Transgenic maize did not have a negative impact on non-target pests in the field; more aphids and leafhoppers but similar numbers of cutworms and wireworms were counted in Bt versus non-Bt fields; in any case differences in damage or yield were recorded. We observed no difference in the numbers of the most relevant predators in fields containing transgenic or no transgenic maize.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 5%
Australia 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Slovakia 1 1%
Unknown 67 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Professor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 64%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 7 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,908,917
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#345
of 889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,546
of 154,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.