↓ Skip to main content

Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
483 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
825 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review
Published in
Natural Hazards, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2
Authors

Melanie S. Kappes, Margreth Keiler, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, Thomas Glade

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 825 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 806 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 175 21%
Student > Master 118 14%
Researcher 115 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 4%
Other 117 14%
Unknown 226 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 165 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 150 18%
Environmental Science 116 14%
Social Sciences 35 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 2%
Other 71 9%
Unknown 275 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,035,338
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#311
of 2,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,490
of 179,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.