↓ Skip to main content

Vibrio Cholerae

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Vibrio Cholerae'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Laboratory Culturing Techniques and Maintenance of Vibrio cholerae
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Genotypic and Phenotypic Assays to Distinguish Vibrio cholerae Biotype
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Preparation of Vibrio cholerae Samples for RNA-seq Analysis
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Random Transposon Mutagenesis of Vibrio cholerae
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Metabolomics of Vibrio cholerae
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Natural Cotransformation and Multiplex Genome Editing by Natural Transformation (MuGENT) of Vibrio cholerae
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Fly Models of Vibrio cholerae Infection and Colonization
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Danio rerio as a Native Host Model for Understanding Pathophysiology of Vibrio cholerae
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Transposon Sequencing of Vibrio cholerae in the Infant Rabbit Model of Cholera
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Isolation of Outer Membrane Vesicles Including Their Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Utilization of Vibrio cholerae as a Model Organism to Screen Natural Product Libraries for Identification of New Antibiotics
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Infant Mouse Model of Vibrio cholerae Infection and Colonization
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Methods for Assessments of Collagenolytic Activity of the Vibrio cholerae Extracellular Proteases, Purification of Secreted Collagenase VchC, and Extraction of Type I Collagen from Fish Skin
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Proteomics of Vibrio cholerae
Attention for Chapter 8: Fly Models of Vibrio cholerae Infection and Colonization
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Fly Models of Vibrio cholerae Infection and Colonization
Chapter number 8
Book title
Vibrio Cholerae
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8685-9_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8684-2, 978-1-4939-8685-9
Authors

Alexandra E. Purdy, Purdy, Alexandra E.

Abstract

Studies of Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis in the context of novel eukaryotic model systems have expanded our understanding of genes that underlie V. cholerae interactions with humans, as well as host organisms in the environment. These model systems have also helped uncover new functions for many gene products, revealing previously unknown virulence mechanisms. The Drosophila model for V. cholerae infection is a powerful tool for discovering new genetic pathways that govern bacterial physiology and colonization in the arthropod gastrointestinal tract. Assays to measure both virulence and colonization have been established and are easily adopted in labs unfamiliar with Drosophila work. Experiments to compare survival of flies colonized with different bacterial mutants are simple to perform and can be completed in less than a week, allowing colonization to be quantified and localized easily. The availability of molecular and genetic tools for the fly enables further exploration of host factors that restrict V. cholerae colonization and invasive infection. Based on the Drosophila system, a house fly (Musca domestica) model of V. cholerae colonization has also been developed. The new house fly model may prove a useful tool for examining V. cholerae infection dynamics in the context of a host carrying a complex microbial community, with a fundamentally different ecology that may increase its chances of acting as a vector for cholera disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,555
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,979
of 444,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#593
of 1,483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.