↓ Skip to main content

A model‐based reconstruction technique for quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A model‐based reconstruction technique for quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1002/mrm.25921
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Tran‐Gia, David Lohr, Andreas Max Weng, Christian Oliver Ritter, Daniel Stäb, Thorsten Alexander Bley, Herbert Köstler

Abstract

To reduce saturation effects in the arterial input function (AIF) estimation of quantitative myocardial first-pass saturation recovery perfusion imaging by employing a model-based reconstruction. Imaging was performed with a saturation recovery prepared radial FLASH sequence. A model-based reconstruction was applied for reconstruction. By exploiting prior knowledge about the relaxation process, an image series with different saturation recovery times was reconstructed. By evaluating images with an effective saturation time of approximately 3 ms, saturation effects in the AIF determination were reduced. In a volunteer study, this approach was compared with a standard prebolus technique. In comparison to the low-dose injection of a prebolus acquisition, saturation effects were further reduced in the AIFs determined using the model-based approach. These effects, which were clearly visible for all six volunteers, were reflected in a statistically significant difference of up to 20% in the absolute perfusion values. The application of model-based reconstruction algorithms in quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging promises a significant improvement of the AIF determination. In addition to greatly reducing saturation effects that occur even for the prebolus methods, only a single bolus has to be applied. Magn Reson Med, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 35%
Researcher 6 26%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 26%
Engineering 6 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2015.
All research outputs
#22,012,573
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#6,329
of 7,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,003
of 279,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#51
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,062 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.