| Title |
Root hairs: development, growth and evolution at the plant-soil interface
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-011-0845-4 |
| Authors |
Sourav Datta, Chul Min Kim, Monica Pernas, Nuno D. Pires, Hélène Proust, Thomas Tam, Priya Vijayakumar, Liam Dolan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 27% |
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 47 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,128,890
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#606
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,343
of 117,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.