↓ Skip to main content

Obstetrical Mode of Delivery and Childhood Behavior and Psychological Development in a British Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Obstetrical Mode of Delivery and Childhood Behavior and Psychological Development in a British Cohort
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2616-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen A. Curran, John F. Cryan, Louise C. Kenny, Timothy G. Dinan, Patricia M. Kearney, Ali S. Khashan

Abstract

The association between mode of delivery [specifically birth by Cesarean section (CS)] and induction of labor (IOL) psychological development at age 7 was assessed [including autism spectrum disorders (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and behavioral difficulties]. The Millennium cohort study, a nationally representative UK cohort of children (including 13,141 children), was used. There was no association between planned CS and ASD [aOR 0.58; (95 % CI 0.19-1.79)] or ADHD [aOR 0.54; (95 % CI 0.18-1.64)] analyses. Induced vaginal delivery was significantly associated with behavioral difficulties in unadjusted [OR 1.26; (95 % CI 1.03-1.54)], but not adjusted analysis [OR 1.15; (95 % CI 0.82-1.60)]. There was no association between mode of delivery and ASD or ADHD in this cohort. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between mode of delivery and IOL and psychological development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 28%
Psychology 25 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 46 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,450,704
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#548
of 5,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,140
of 290,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#9
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.