You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association study of intraocular pressure uncovers new pathways to glaucoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-018-0176-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart MacGregor, Jue-Sheng Ong, Jiyuan An, Xikun Han, Tiger Zhou, Owen M. Siggs, Matthew H. Law, Emmanuelle Souzeau, Shiwani Sharma, David J. Lynn, Jonathan Beesley, Bronwyn Sheldrick, Richard A. Mills, John Landers, Jonathan B. Ruddle, Stuart L. Graham, Paul R. Healey, Andrew J. R. White, Robert J. Casson, Stephen Best, John R Grigg, Ivan Goldberg, Joseph E. Powell, David C. Whiteman, Graham L. Radford-Smith, Nicholas G. Martin, Grant W. Montgomery, Kathryn P. Burdon, David A. Mackey, Puya Gharahkhani, Jamie E. Craig, Alex W. Hewitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 34% |
| United States | 7 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Saint Lucia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 46% |
| Scientists | 13 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#545,528
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,085
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,551
of 345,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#32
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.